|
||||||
The Wizard of Oz as Allegory and Fairy TaleDeconstructing a Classic American Book Written for Children
Ever Since Henry Littlefield's 1964 interpretations of the Wizard of Oz as political allegory were published, scholars have attempted to build on that analysis.
Frank Baum’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz has, for decades, been taught as an example of Gilded Age political allegory, reflecting Populism and the gold versus silver debate. Popular American History survey texts like America Past & Present (Robert A. Divine, Et Al., Pearson/Longman) devote 2-page feature essays to the interpretation. Baum himself, writing in April 1900, states that the book “was written solely to please children of today.” How is the Wizard of Oz to be viewed? The Interpretations of Henry LittlefieldHenry M. Littlefield’s interpretations of Baum’s book were published in 1964. Littlefield, a high school teacher, attempted to provide students with a more interesting way to understand the Populist issues of the late 19th Century. David B. Parker, writing in Journal of the Georgia Association of Historians, [1] analyzes subsequent interpretations that took Littlefield’s conclusions further. Writing in March, 1988 (Los Angeles Times), Michael A. Genovese, then at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, gives readers the allegorical representations:
The deconstruction of the Oz story continued. A college essay, posted on the Cornell University website and written by Grant Wang and Dan Jacobs goes even further. As an example, quoting from the book, Wang and Jacobs related the broken or missing yellow bricks in the road to Oz as Baum’s way of revealing “his opinion that although the gold standard had holes and obstacles, it could still last through the long haul.” The Wizard of Oz as a Fairy TalePsychology Professor Sheldon Cashdan, in his book The Witch Must Die, analyzes Baum’s story as “a fairy tale not only for our time but for all time” and compares the tale’s dynamics to other popular fairy tales. [2] According to Cashdan, Dorothy’s trip to Oz reflects the unconscious and the many twists and turns are a “metaphor for personal growth.” Cashdan’s chapter on Baum’s story highlights the multi-faceted way scholars can take a story and suggest a myriad of interpretations. Was Baum influenced by folklore, as happens in many fairy tales? [3] To what extend did Baum support and sympathize with Populism? An Alternative View of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz David Parker quotes from a 1919 biographical piece written by Martin Gardner about Baum and his political beliefs and activities. Gardner concluded that Baum was “inactive in politics” but his sympathies were “on the side of the laboring classes.” Could these have been Baum’s munchkins who, in his book, slaved night and day for the Wicked Witch of the East? But Baum also supported women’s suffrage. Dorothy might have better represented the emerging feminist whose self-actualization prepared her to kill the evil witch at the end of the story. Dorothy, a girl, was the leader of the intrepid troupe. Cashdan identified and analyzed each specific “shortcoming” relative to the Scarecrow, Lion, and Woodsman. Yet it was Dorothy whose adventures and confrontations with evil brought out the missing elements in each companion. It was Dorothy who ultimately killed the witch and exposed the wizard as a hypocrite. Dorothy emerges as the heroine, having overcome tremendous obstacles. Many Ways to Interpret OzThe Wonderful Wizard of Oz might have been written, as Baum stated, simply as a modern fairy tale. But, like the popular Hollywood interpretation that can easily be used to allegorize the Great Depression, it can be seen in many intriguing ways. Sources:
The copyright of the article The Wizard of Oz as Allegory and Fairy Tale in Modern US History is owned by Michael Streich. Permission to republish The Wizard of Oz as Allegory and Fairy Tale in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||